Jump to content

Talk:Mattie the Goose-boy (poem)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Goose-boy.jpg

[edit]

Image:Goose-boy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 06:34, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Origin not unknown.

[edit]

The origin of the folk tale is not really unknown. The tale is so similar to the Akkadian tale of the Old Man of Nippur (Poor Man of Nippur), dated about 1500 BCE, that it has to be a wandering story having wandered from mouth to mouth for over 3000 years! Uttrediay (talk) 19:54, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, before making the connection, one would have to ascertain whether Mihály Fazekas could have been remodelling the folk tale after the Akkadian one, as Akkadian started being deciphered in 1767, 37 years before he wrote his poem. Uttrediay (talk) 20:55, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I found this paper. I don't read Hungarian and I'm not sure whether it's peer-reviewed, but the last page is a summary in English. It says the Akkadian tale was excavated and translated 1951, which is more than a century after the publication of Matyi. I think it's safe to rule out Mihály being a secret achaeologist who can read Akkadian. The paper also mentions that similar folk tales can be found in various parts of Europe and in the Thousand and One Nights. C9mVio9JRy (talk) 18:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]